Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex Hayes's avatar

Solid roadmap, thanks!

I think the 'democratization' phase mentioned here is going to happen faster than people think, thanks to tools like monobot.ai making AI Chat and Voice agent deployment significantly easier for non-technical teams.

Expand full comment
Roshan's avatar

LLMs are excellent stochastic generators, but they’re not full decision systems. They lack persistent objectives, constraint checks, causal models, and verification layers. That’s why the next frontier isn’t a bigger model—it’s Modular Intelligence (MI).

MI treats the LLM as a computational primitive inside a larger control architecture:

• Planner module: decomposes goals into tractable subproblems

• Constraint & policy module: enforces legal, safety, and domain rules

• Simulator module: runs counterfactuals and causal checks

• Verifier module: validates outputs, catches drift, resolves contradictions

• Adversarial module: stress-tests assumptions and searches for failure modes

• Memory/state module: keeps persistent context and long-horizon consistency

The LLM slots into these pipelines as a flexible reasoning tool, not the governance layer.

This architecture fixes the known weaknesses of raw LLMs:

• unbounded reasoning becomes bounded, rule-governed computation,

• hallucinations are caught at the verifier layer,

• plans become auditable and reproducible,

• domain knowledge is encoded in modules instead of prompts,

• and system behaviour remains stable even as underlying models change.

In short:

LLMs give you undirected cognitive horsepower.

Modular Intelligence turns that horsepower into reliable, steerable, fault-tolerant intelligence.

It’s the difference between a powerful engine and a complete vehicle with steering, brakes, instrumentation, and safety systems.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts