7 Comments
User's avatar
Dan Stillit's avatar

Great piece. Have you noticed the fury building amongst Anthropic's customer base, exhausted and stymied by its customer service robots? You're a CTO and front office have blown through their inference budgets by 300% and you need to discuss something with a human at Anthropic. Good luck.

Tillervision's avatar

I’ve paid for a subscription, but don’t have access. Any suggestions? Tried the Substack chat, and did not have a great experience.

Bruno Gavino - Codedesign.org's avatar

Tokens got cheaper, but nobody re-architected the workflows built when they were expensive—that’s the actual budget leak, not the API pricing.

Athena Intelligence's avatar

The speed and efficiency of a firm’s ability to create new products is an indication of how well engineered the data is. AI/ML doesn’t change this.

The greater the ease and speed of new product creation, the more cost effective and profitable the business will be - this was understood by the software industry back in the 1900’s - I feel like all the excitement about AI and LLM has caused investors to forget the fundamentals.

Shivangi's avatar

Really interesting article, and a really strong insight about who wins in this model. I think you're right that buying outcomes will be the easier choice for most people looking to integrate AI, since it's a fixed cost, but it would be interesting to see how those cost structures would work.

Sara Eson's avatar

This landed for me as a Lovable lover.

I’ve built three projects with it, and what I feel most clearly is the shift from tokens to outcomes.

But when the machinery disappears for the user, the ledger does not disappear.

It just moves somewhere harder to see.