Dario's 'infrastructure over applications' framing resonates. I'd extend it: the companies winning with AI aren't necessarily the ones with the best infrastructure - they're the ones with the clearest direction.
I've been building with AI daily for months. The pattern I keep seeing: undirected AI produces technically correct, creatively empty output. Directed AI - with specific constraints and a real point of view - produces things worth shipping.
The Dario interviews always skew toward capability. The thing nobody's modeling: direction quality as a competitive advantage.
the radiologists point is the most underrated one here, hardest technical part automated, job still exists. that's probably the dramatic template for most professions
Dario's 'infrastructure over applications' framing resonates. I'd extend it: the companies winning with AI aren't necessarily the ones with the best infrastructure - they're the ones with the clearest direction.
I've been building with AI daily for months. The pattern I keep seeing: undirected AI produces technically correct, creatively empty output. Directed AI - with specific constraints and a real point of view - produces things worth shipping.
The Dario interviews always skew toward capability. The thing nobody's modeling: direction quality as a competitive advantage.
Wrote about this after 30 days of experiments: https://thoughts.jock.pl/p/directed-ai-experiments-vibe-business
the radiologists point is the most underrated one here, hardest technical part automated, job still exists. that's probably the dramatic template for most professions
Appreciated this dive into the past/ split. The reasons for the split seem so much more clear today than they were at the time. Safety is the ballgame